You've built actors that maintain state for individual entities. You've built workflows that orchestrate multi-step processes. Now the real power emerges: combining both to create systems where stateful entities participate in durable orchestration.
Consider an AI agent task management system. Each task needs its own state—title, status, deadline, assignee, history. That's perfect for a TaskActor. But completing a task isn't a single operation—it requires validation, assignment, notification, and status updates across multiple steps. That's perfect for a TaskProcessingWorkflow. The question isn't "actors OR workflows?" but "actors AND workflows working together."
When should you use actors, workflows, or both? Apply this analysis:
The most powerful systems leverage the strengths of both:
The most common hybrid pattern: workflows invoke actor methods through activities to update entity state at each orchestration step.
Workflow code must be deterministic. Actor calls involve network I/O—you can't call them directly in workflow code. Instead, wrap actor invocations in activities:
Sometimes state changes in an actor should kick off a workflow. For example, when a TaskActor's status changes to "ready_for_processing", it should start the processing workflow.
The key to hybrid systems is clear ownership of state and responsibility.
Your dapr-deployment skill now covers actors and workflows separately. Extend it with hybrid patterns.
Prompt 2: Implement Workflow-to-Actor Communication
Prompt 3: Implement Actor-to-Workflow Triggering
Safety Note: When actors trigger workflows, ensure idempotency. The actor should check if a workflow is already running before starting a new one. Multiple workflow instances processing the same entity can cause status corruption.